Sections 302, 337A (ii), 337F (i) (iii) (iv), 337 L (2), 34 and 109 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Section 417 (2A) Qatil Um, whereby Excerpts from the lawyer for the appellant / complainant against the arguments against the plaintiff, defendant, defendant, commonwealth, commonwealth, excluding the allegations, any unlawful, Was unable to detect weakness or instability. There was no case that required interference with an unclean judgment, which seems to have been strictly adopted in accordance with the law-giver's resolved principles, claiming his presence at a hot spot at this crucial time. And they were planning to establish their presence. His previous statement, which testified, had greatly improved, while two other witnesses' names were also involved in the complaint, but despite being free persons, they were not presented by the prosecution during the trial. Was dismissed, and they were unnecessarily dismissed as having been present. At the time of the incident, the complainant, after not established, a better version of it, the person who witnessed the incident, has been excluded, in view of the widespread delay in the medical examination of the deceased, it can be said That none of the witnesses witnessed it. The medical evidence of the incident had little benefit in the prosecution's case; the trial court correctly denied the weapons being recovered, as none of them were stained with blood, more than once. It could have been, claimed by an unbelievable and rejected eye
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
