Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAZIA RAFIQUE versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKRIAYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN SERVICE

Article 199 Constitutional Application Although the educational institution had three possibilities, the student's failure to succeed in the LLB Part II Ex exam convinced the student that he was entitled to three Grace Marks, which appeared in parts. Knowledge was not entitled to Grace Marx's three possibilities and, failing in his last attempt, he was not entitled to trace marks. The applicant did not come to the court with open hands because he failed to disclose that the last and third He had two chances before the occasion. The constitutional application was rejected

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• LALA ZAR TEXTILE MILLS v. MUHAMMAD YASAR HAYAT 2014 MLD 820
• SARDAR ALI v. State 2014 YLR 822
• NAZIR AHMAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 828
• NASIR MEHMOOD v. KHAWAR HUSSAIN 2014 CLC 832
• IMAM AHSAN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2014 PCrLJ 838
• MAGNA PROCESSING INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2014 PTD 841
• SAIF ULLAH SALEEM ARSHAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 850
• Ch. RIAZ AHMED v. MUHAMMAD QAISAR ABBAS 2014 YLR 851

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

inheritance advocates near Dargai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes