MUHAMMAD YOUSAF MALIK versus MUHAMMAD SULEMAN DOGAR
Article 6, Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O. XIII, R 2 and O XLI, R 27 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Suite, Proof of Applicant / Pre-Empire Affidavit for Reconciliation Proof Vendor Record After being recorded / respondent, the pre-emptor stated that he did not want to present the evidence in the plaintiff after filing an application for the preparation of additional evidence of Patwari, which was filed by the prosecution. The lawsuit was rejected by amendment. In addition, the pre-emptor did not furnish a copy of the complete jam bonds containing the complete measles number of the field and said that inadvertently Patwari could not be presented as a witness, which together stated that the evidence. This is not a sufficient reason for the inadequacy of. Because the umpire was given the opportunity to produce evidence in the coup, which he refused to give a blanket statement. The request for additional evidence was not guaranteed by the law unless recording of Patwari's statements would be helpful to the Emperor's profession unless the constitutional application containing the complete loss of the farm's jurisdiction was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
