Section 13 (e) Definition of Prohibition of Unlicensed Weapons The benefit of the doubt was not sent to the forensic and ballistic expert for the allegedly recovered arms, so as to determine the nature and potential of the weapon. And it was either automatic, semi-auto, or working place where the suspect's arrest was described as densely populated and trading area, but the police made no attempt to involve the public. Was. Or there was nothing in the record that showed that this attempt was made, and the privateers refused to join the Section 103, CR PC Maintenance Advisers that two private individuals in the area. As a matter of fact, it was deemed necessary, unless it was by the prosecution that it was not possible to have two advisers in the statements of the prosecution witnesses in connection with the recovery of arms, contradicting the locality, in the case of the prosecution. It was enough to raise suspicion to the police officers, because there were so many citizens who were good witnesses in court proceedings like any other person, Although some extra care was needed when he was the only witness in this case, in the present case, the whole process, from the arrest of the accused, was very much investigated and presented. Without any legal authority, the course taken by the prosecution was a clear violation of the law, which made the trial investigation invalid because it was illegal, because no legal action was being taken, Was entitled to take advantage of the doubt, not as a matter of grace, but as a right-of-prosecution suspect, Kalashnikov
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
