Section 498 Explanatory Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (i), (iii), 337 F (i), 337 L (2), 354, 147 and 149 of Shijjah i Khaififah, Shijjah i Hashima, Dmiyah, Badi using Due to pre-arrest bail, the accused denied the conviction that the case was of two versions, and that the complaining party had reported the matter to the injured, the accused deserved the benefit of the concession in bail. In the cross version, the simple injuries were attributed to the complainant, so the shortage was unheard of. And as a result, the investigating agency did not accept the cross version, and was canceled, the defendant was unable to identify any dishonesty by the complainant, falsely implicating him in this case. Was charged. The charge against the accused was to break the bone in his head. The complainant's father, in the circumstances, was required for further investigation. The accused was not entitled to bail privileges. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
