Find a Lawyer

MST. AASIYA BIBI versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Section 9 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 58 (f) was the mortgagee of the suit property for the recovery of the bank loan and this order was passed by this judgment and the banking court that The bail was not implemented by. The same was not available on the court record. The selection of the appellants was contrary to the record, where personal guarantees were available. Once the bail was not open to the appellants on the bald claim that there was no bail on the record. do not have. Appellant failed to identify any illegality in the judgment passed by the Banking Court, the appeal was dismissed in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• SNGPL v. OGRA 2014 PLD 167
• ABDUL WAHAB v. State 2014 YLR 171
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. State 2014 MLD 171
• RASHID ALI v. SECRETARY INDUSTRIES 2014 PLD 173
• FAQIR MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD SHAKIL 2014 PLD 177
• SITARA v. SOHRAB 2014 PLD 179
• MUNAWAR ABBAS COTTON GINNER TAUNSA DARRI PEER ADIL v. UNITED BANK LTD. 2014 CLD 180
• MUHAMMAD SHABBIR v. State 2014 YLR 187

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

law firms from Sikandarabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes