Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR ABBAS COTTON GINNER TAUNSA DARRI PEER ADIL versus UNITED BANK LTD.

Sections 9 and 10 suing for bank loan leave to defend this claim Vacant documents The banking court dismissed the leave application to defend the case and consequently ruled in favor of the plaintiff bank. went. The defendants claimed that the blank documents were not signed by them. The signatures were signed by the defendants and no illegal identification of any kind was disclosed in the credit and debit entries, as indicated in the accounts statement, giving the blank documents by the defendants, according to the bank's choice. The trial court concluded that defendants failed to sue for a grant of leave for defense failed to indicate that defendants failed to read any false statement or evidence in the judgment and Banking court refuses to interfere with decision passed by High Court and Ben The King Court-approved decree was dismissed in the circumstances. \ R \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• RASHID ALI v. SECRETARY INDUSTRIES 2014 PLD 173
• Mst. AASIYA BIBI v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2014 CLD 176
• FAQIR MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD SHAKIL 2014 PLD 177
• SITARA v. SOHRAB 2014 PLD 179
• MUHAMMAD SHABBIR v. State 2014 YLR 187
• Professor Syed KHURSHID ALAM v. Ch. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2014 CLC 188
• Mst. SHAMA TALIB v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI 2014 PLD 189
• SHAHID v. State 2014 MLD 190

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

female advocates from Kotmomin lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes