Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed's sentence of appreciation of evidence, the immediate reduction of the FIR, dismissed the possibility of conciliation and deliberation, a prosecution witness who was the original daughter of the accused. He was a resident of the house where the incident took place, on which occasion his presence was quite natural. It was said that the length of the testimony was examined, but that its evidence could not be dispersed during cross-examination, its evidence was made more controversial than circumstantial evidence, the evidence of other prosecution witnesses was straightforward. And the trustworthy manor in which the deceased was pronounced dead and supported by medical evidence at the time of his death was granted further evidence of the trial case by evidence of circumstances, not the prosecution's testimony. Not only were the deceased's relatives, but also closer to the accused, as well as the accused being falsely implicated in the case. There was no reason for the accused to record a witness's testimony under Section 161 that the deceased could not be evacuated on the sole basis of their relationship, according to the CCP Investigation Officer, the name of the named witness was immediate. The accused submitted in the FIR was that the deceased committed suicide, and he was wrongly implicated in the case; the petition was not heard by the accused during the investigation of the case. Was done, but the FIR had a stated purpose, not to be described by the complainant and the prosecution witnesses in court Or in the absence of any evidence regarding the stimulus, it cannot be believed that its body
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
