Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition The tenant's dispute for excluding tenants in payment of tenancy was that he was a co-owner of the property The application for eviction was simultaneously accepted as a tenancy by the tenant. Accepted the document, which was to prove that he had paid the rent since November 2007, that no rent receipt was submitted to the court by the tenant, which was not part of the record and Was not exhibited, the conclusions entered by the two courts cannot be considered. Neither the wrongful nor any false advertising and lack of evidence resulted in the tenant failing to prove part of the property in his favor, so the suit for removal of the rent was leased to the tenant without paying rent. Was not entitled to retain the property. The concurrence of the courts below as a court of appeal in deciding a constitutional application cannot be conclusive. The constitutional jurisdiction was interfered with by the High Court unless the evidence was misread or read. Evidence-based conclusions are not considered or the patent's illegality or any defect in the jurisdiction was not committed by the courts below in the circumstances in which the constitutional application was dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
