Section 302 (b) mitigating AMD evidence to mitigate the circumstances of the conviction was presented to the witness's witness account by the complainant and other prosecutor's witnesses, who fully supported the prosecution's case, and Prosecution witnesses testified. During each of his statements, he explained each part of the events in a very unobtrusive way. Syed eyewitnesses have also explained the manner and manner in which the incident took place, the prosecution witnesses were ready to take the oath on the Koran that the original suspect was. They had substantially proved their presence at the time of the incident. And while witnessing the incident, minor contradictions in the case, statements of prosecution witnesses, contradictions in legal evidence, medical evidence, and general accountability were not taken into account, especially considering the criminal capacity of the accused in this case. Should go In cases where otherwise, the account was proved by credible and credible evidence, the matter was reported to the police, which was sufficiently clear. And there was no unintentional or unforgivable delay in the FIR delay registration if there was a doctor postponing the autopsy. And the prosecution's case could not be terminated in the presence of the parties who provided proof of their trust in the delay, known to each other, and because of their close association with each other, the identity of the wrongdoer or the real There was no possibility of replacing the accused with the offender Bald. The accused pleaded that the victim had been killed by someone else, he had survived, only his skin was saved.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
