Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SULTAN MAHMOOD versus THE STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Section 307/34 Appeal for hearing after 6 years of suspension of sentence for the accused accused of compromising with the accused, already pending under the circumstances

1986 P Cr. L J 2410

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

SULTAN MAHMOOD and another‑‑Appellants

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 367 of 1980, decided on 19th March, 1986.

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑---

‑‑‑S. 307/34‑‑Injured person entering into compromise with accused persons‑‑Appeal coming up for hearing six years after suspension of sentence of accused‑‑Sentence reduced to one already undergone in circumstances.

(b) Penal Code (XLV of

1860)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 307/34‑‑Compromise‑‑Compromise between parties in non- compoundable offence is a recognised ground for reduction in sentence.‑‑[Compromise‑‑Sentence].

Sh. Nasim Hassan and Lal Khan Baluch for Appellants.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 19th March, 1986.

JUDGMENT

This criminal appeal arises from the judgment of the learned Magistrate Section 30, whereby he on 27‑3‑1980 convicted Sultan Muhammad and Ata Muhammad appellants under section 307/34, P.P.C. and sentenced them to five years R.I. each and a fine of Rs.5,000 each in default thereof to further R.I. for six months each.

The learned Magistrate also directed that the licensed guns Exhs. P.2 and P.4 and licences P/3 and P/5 be confiscated to State.

2. The learned counsel has not challenged the conviction. He has requested for leniency in the sentence on the ground that Nasir Abbas injured has entered into compromise with the appellants. Nasir Abbas is present in the Court. He has produced application Mark 'A' in this behalf. The same be placed on the record. No one has appeared on behalf of State to oppose this appeal.

3. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellants with care. The appellants were convicted on 27‑3‑1980. They were allowed bail on 7‑5‑1980. Furthermore, compromise between the parties in non‑compoundable offence is a recognised ground for the reduction in the sentence. For these reasons, I feel inclined to reduce the sentences awarded to the appellants from 5 years' R.I. to one already undergone by them. The fine of Rs.5,000 each, is also remitted. In the peculiar circumstances of the case, I direct that guns P/2 and P/4 and licenses Exhs. P/3 and P/4 shall not be confiscated and be returned to the, appellants. The appeal is disposed of accordingly

H.A.K. Appeal partly accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Lasbela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.