Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18'/B/C of 1985, decided on 8th December, 1985.
‑‑‑Ss.156(1)(89), 157 &, 168‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), S.3‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Ten maunds of Charas recovered‑ Official concerned not appearing before Court with relevant record‑ Investigating Agency being not interested in defending application bail granted.
Khurshid Alam Ramay for Petitioner.
Malik Muhammad Qayyum, Deputy Attorney‑General for the State.
The learned Deputy Attorney‑General says that he had specifically advised the official concerned to appear before the Court with relevant record but he has not cared to it. Apparently, the Investigating Agency is not interested in defending this application which is more surprising allegedly recovered from the petitioner was about ten maunds. however, as the Investigating Agency is not interested in defending this application, the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rupees two lac with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Customs.
S.A.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer