Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FIRDAUS BEGUM versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 498 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 Bail, Lady's Grant Granted that a Major Bridegroom confesses to the Girl's Father's marriage. Accused of harassing the petitioner against constitutional petitioner, it is deemed appropriate to entertain the request for bail directly before registration of the case and the accused has been granted bail in the circumstances.

1986 M L D 2411

[Lahore]

Before Saeed‑ur‑Rehman, J

Mst. FIRDAUS BEGUM and another‑‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1635/B of 1980, decided on 7th June, 1980.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S.498‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.11‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Lady accused admittedly a major‑‑Nikahnama produced‑‑Father of girl admitting her marriage‑‑Constitutional petition against Police Official for harassing accused having disposed, of earlier than registration of case‑‑Application for bail considered appropriate to be entertained directly and accused admitted to bail in circumstances.

Yusuf Ali Khan, Bar‑at‑Law for Petitioners.

Rao Muhammad Yusuf for the State.

ORDER

Mst. Firdaus Begum petitioner being absent, the learned counsel does not press the petition on her behalf.

The learned counsel submits that Muhammad Siddique petitioner married Mst. Firdaus Begum, aged about 22 years, on 30‑3‑1980. As the S. H.O. Police Station City; Kasur started harassing the spouses, they filed Writ Petition No.3562 of 1980 in this Court which was disposed of on 14‑4‑1980. Thereafter, the S.H.O. manoeuvred to have a case registered on 5‑5‑1980 for an occurrence alleged to have taken place on 6‑4‑1980. As the S. H.O. was a respondent in the writ petition I consider it appropriate to entertain this petition directly.

Even according to the F.I.R., Mst. Firdaus Begum is a major. The learned counsel has produced original Nikahnama according to which the marriage was performed on 30‑3‑1980.

Notice for 7‑6‑1980 on which date the Investigating Officer shall attend with record. In the meantime, Muhammad Saddique petitioner is admitted to interim bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties in tile like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar (Judl.) of this Court. He shall join the investigation and also appear before this Court on the next date of hearing.

Mst. Firdous Begum present in Court and identified by her father Mohkim Din complainant states that she left her parental house and married Muhammad Siddique petitioner of her own. The marriage was performed at Rukanpura, City Kasur, and, she put her thumbimpression on the Nikahnama.

In this view of the matter and there being no dispute about her majority, I confirm the interim bail allowed to the petitioner by my order, dated 24‑5‑1980.

S. A. Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Eminabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.