Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

INAYATULLAH versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 497 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 bail, no charge of adultery against the accused challan was completed and the police petitioner did not allow bail, Conditions

1986 P Cr. L J 1378(2)

[Lahore]

Before Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, J

INAYATULLA H‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2732/B of 1985, decided on 19th November, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 11‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑No allegation of Zina against accused‑ Challan completed and accused no more required by Police‑‑Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances.

Irshad Hussain Bhatti for Petitioner.

Farooq Bedar Asstt. A.‑G. for the State.

Date of hearing: 19th November, 1985.

ORDER

Inayat Ullah son of Khadam Hussain Moghal, resident of Mohalla New Area, Tehsil Kharian, District Gujrat, has applied for bail after arrest.

2. A case under section 11 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 was registered against him at Police 'Station, Kharian.

3. The report was lodged by Fazal Ahmad, father of abductee, on 19‑3‑1985 at 5.00 p.m.

4. Bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gujrat by order, dated 17‑9‑1985.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had been behind the bars for 7 months and the trial has not yet commenced. There was no allegation of rape against him. There was a delay of four days in lodging the report. Police Station was hardly at a distance of Three furlongs from the place where the alleged incident took place.

6. I have also heard learned A . A . ‑G.

7. It is an admitted position that the allegation against the petitioner is not of rape. Challan has been completed. The person of the petitioner is no more required by the police. I, ther6fore, admit him to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C.Gujrat.

S.G.D. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from FR DI Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.