Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. MUSARRAT AFZA NAZ versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 498 Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 18 and 22 Passport Act (XX of 1974) Section 6 Bail before arrest, pre-arrest bail of the accused on the bail appeared before the court The number of hearings but no invoice was offered during this period it was alleged that he had married abroad but had not returned his case due to serious illness The accused is returning and is seeking bail. The bail was granted before the suspect was arrested

1986 P Cr. L J 1377

[Lahore]

Before Rustam S. Sidhwa, J

Mst. MUSARRAT AFZA NAZ‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous 2898/B of 1985, decided on 5th December. 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑S. 498‑‑Emigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Ss. 17. 18 & 22‑ Passports Act (XX of 1974). S. 6‑‑Pre‑arrest bail, grant of‑‑Accused was previously on interim pre‑arrest bail arid attended Court on a number of hearings but no challan was submitted during said period‑ Accused having got married went abroad but could not return to a tend her case due to serious ailment‑‑Accused returning and seeking bail‑ Accused being a lady was granted bail before arrest in circumstances.

Rana Tufail Munir Khan for Petitioner.

C . M . Latif for the ‑State.

JUDGMENT

This is a petition under section 498, Cr.P.C. by Mst. Musarrat Afza Naz, petitioner, for grant‑of pre‑arrest bail in respect of a case instituted against her and four others under sections 17, 18. 22 of the Immigration Ordinance and section 6 of the Passport Act.

2. It appears that three persons who happened to be the co‑accused of the petitioner were caught while boarding a plane, as they were found to possess forged passports. On interrogation, they pointed out that those forged passports had been provided by Mist. Musarrat Afza Naz, the present petitioner, against receipt of a large sum of money and that she, with one other person, had already boarded the plane. Accordingly the petitioner and her companion who happened to be her brother, were off‑loaded. On interrogation the petitioner disclosed that her passport and that of her other four colleagues had all been secured from one Mian Abdul Aziz against a payment of Rs.1,40,000.

3. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel fur the petitioner and the State. It appears that the petitioner was previously on interim pre‑arrest bail and was attending Court on a number of hearings during which period no challan was submitted. In the meantime having, got married she went to Saudi Arabia but could not return to A attend to her case, as she fell seriously ill there. She has now returned. Being a lady I exercise my discretion in her favour and order the confirmation, of her interim pre-arrest bail.

4. For the foregoing reasons, this petition is accepted and the interim pre-arrest bail granted to Mst. Musarrat Afza Naz, petitioner on 20-11-1985, is hereby confirmed.

H.A.K. Bail before arrest granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Musafir Khana lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.