Section 22 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), OXLIII, R3 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 and Article 168 Maxim: No person can take advantage of his wrong appeal. Under Section 22 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) petitioner's request for a ban on the delay of the Ordinance 2001 was dismissed for non-prosecution The applicant's position was that he should not appear in his court at the hearing date. The reason was not to list the cause. And that the applicant was a heart patient who was undergoing treatment and therefore was not aware of the date of the hearing. According to Article 168 of the Limitation Act, the time for the dismissal of 1908 began to proceed, not to dismiss the appeal. From the date of knowledge of the application, a period of thirty days was provided for the petitioner to apply for the dismissal of the appeal when the prosecution was invalid, while the applicant filed the application after a period of six months. ????? Due to the difficulty of not receiving the cause list from the bar, no good cause was created which was not only provided to the bar but was also displayed on the website of the High Court. Informed the lawyer by mail. The solicitor's negligence to obtain a casework from SMS and the bar or to check the e-mail or sms of the website was not based on the maximum Nelson Customs Camper Post de In Amoria So propia ( No one can take advantage of their mistake) The request is rejected, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
