Section 2 (b) Reforms Ordinance of Pakistan Article 199 Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Progressive Pensions Pensions Rules, 1985 Constitutional Intro-Court of Appeals Civil Servants, Scope Pension Means Continuing Pension Claims Retired Employees Was. One company, Progressive Papers Ltd, wholly owned by National Press Trust Ltd, wanted to increase the pension paid to civil servants. It was requested that the applicant did not fall in appreciation of a public servant, and as such, he was not entitled to a pension as a retired public servant, an employee whose terms and conditions of service were legally governed. Were not Under the Progressive Pension Rules 1985, the law was not qualified as a public servant, the applicant had no legal or exclusive right to claim pension as a public servant, and only as a company employee Was entitled to do. According to the Progressive Pensions Pension Rules, 1985, no superior right claimed under the pension can be retained on the claim of increase in pension paid to public servants, hence the appeal was dismissed due to lack of legal force. went.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
