Sections 302 (b), 34 and 337f (i) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the general intention in section 7 murder, which led to the termination, the Terrorism Act praised the record of the evidence which led to the conviction of both the accused. Shared by sharing. The joint intent was to fire the deceased and all the witnesses who were injured were in their own statement. The complainant completely reaffirmed the contents of the individual statement and in the KFIR of one of the prosecution witnesses, the date, time and manner of the incident. The people mentioned in the court are the assailants and they have acknowledged the role they played. The prosecution's second witness testified on all counts, saying the witness's statement had some minor contradictions in the evidence, which were not sufficient to raise reasonable doubt or justify the case. A firearm expert's report on the involvement and crime of the accused revealed that the recovered weapons were in working condition, the Anti-Terrorism Islamic Court rightly confessed to the crime, because one person He was charged with murder in light of the day and injuring others by firing, causing mass panic and insecurity. Since the crime took place in a brutal and brutal manner, the accused persons, the defenses taken by them failed to prove immunity, the mere words of the accused persons were not enough to deny and discredit trust. The enthusiastic evidence of the testimony of the prosecution witnesses was properly punished and convicted on the record available after the trial court had properly examined the evidence. Charged off
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
