Find a Lawyer

SYED IMDAD SHAH versus SECRETARY, FOREST AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN

Sections 2 and 3 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Detection of the property The effect of the petitioner was that the buildings and walls were painted with the slogans of political parties and religious organizations which prohibited Islam, the constitution and Balochistan. Opinion was forbidden in the Wallis Ordinance, 2001 Disputes of property were banned in law The law should be uniformly applied and slogans without any fear and support and wallowing on someone else's property. The macro function was when the creator, his messenger and the verses would be named after the Quran Or such other places as may be written in or marked with a bad odor The constitutional request has been dealt with after the necessary passage.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015

• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. DIRECTOR, CULTURE BALOCHISTAN 2015 PLC(CS) 253
• SINGER PAKISTAN LTD. v. NASIR ALI MEER 2015 MLD 267
• BASHIR AHMED v. State 2015 MLD 313
• ABDUL REHMAN v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN 2015 PLC(CS) 318
• MUHAMMAD KHAN v. Ch. ABDUL RAHIM 2015 CLC 343
• MUHAMMAD AYAZ KHAN JOGEZAI v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN STATES AND FRONTIER REGIONS DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2015 PLC(CS) 346
• SOHAIL HAIDER v. State 2015 YLR 366
• SANAULLAH v. State 2015 PCrLJ 382

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2015 →

advocate for immigration from Utror lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes