Section 8 and 42 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Sections 17 and 49 of the Constitution of the Constitution (10 of 1984), Article 79 suit litigation and a Declaration Agreement scope document, were filed for repeated scope defendants' registration while both defendants Case filed for declaration. The trial court held that the suit consisted of the claimants claiming that they were the owners of the suit property that was given to the defendants for cultivation, while the defendants claim that they purchased it through the said property agreement while the plaintiffs' suit. The verdict was pronounced while the defendants were acquitted. The validity contract itself does not create any right, interest or charge on the property in dispute. In the involuntary contract no legal title is created in favor of the defendants. The defendants have a way of achieving the specific performance of the contract. What was, every document guarantees the creation of any right, title to the price of 100 or more or the required registrar for interest will require the sale of the real estate was a contract that was negotiated between the parties. Terms should include the sale of such property, subject to the fulfillment of all other obligations by the owners There is no obligation to sell ydad defendants. In the case of the defendants who were extraordinary witnesses of the agreement to prove its execution, such testimony was fatal. Such a document cannot be proved again to prove that the defendants had any right or interest in the property. Failure to establish that the plaintiffs were the recorded owners of the suit land while the defendants were neither sincere buyers nor
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
