MST. PERVEEN versus CHIEF SECRETARY KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR
Arts 5 (2) and 199 Constitution Compensation for Victims of Terrorist Attacks Bureaucrats and Government Secretaries, Scope Military Assault Duty at Police Stations During the attack, the applicant's son was killed while another was injured. And were injured in the protection of the local police, who were their guardian, but failed to protect their lives, state workers failed to protect the victims, therefore, the government was obligated to compensate the applicant properly. That is, neither the respondents nor the applicant, despite the present application's seven hearings The answer was neither paid nor paid, which is a good example of abominable slowness, the provincial bureaucracy was delaying tactics for no reason, and in most cases they were not able to comment / at any given time. The answers were neither presented nor presented because they never thought of themselves as government employees who were under the Constitution to comply with the meaning of Article 5 (2) of the Constitution Bureaucrats and Administrative Secretaries, who Was a civil servant, should guard against public interest / public treasury, but he was more The bureaucrats and secretaries, who preferred to enjoy power and privilege, had to protect the interests of the government and the public exchequer by responding well in a timely manner, but with little regard for the public interest, they had a humiliating attitude against the court. Apparently the High Court directed that the applicant should be paid more than the prescribed amount. Family of bomb blast victims. Application requested
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
