Find a Lawyer

HAQ NAWAZ versus SANAULLAH KHAN

Article 13 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), VIII, R1 Statute of Martyrs (10 of 1984), Article 117 whereby it is requested that the right of the plaintiff be invoked before the right of the plaintiff to be absent The petitioner's superior right and performance as evidence to prove the effect will not have any effect on the plea, if it is not proved by the evidence, the absence of the plaintiff or the disclosure of facts by the plaintiff support this application. I will still influence the plaintiff's case despite the proceedings. The litigation does not carry any weight unless it is proved by any kind of evidence unless it is acknowledged by another party or proven by any proven evidence.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• Malik UMER FAROOQ v. FEDERATION 2014 YLR 73
• KHUDADAD v. GHULAM AHMAD 2014 MLD 78
• Mirza ALI KHAN v. HIDAYAT ULLAH KHAN 2014 PCrLJ 78
• NIGAH HUSSAIN v. CIRCLE OFFICER, ACE, MANSEHRA 2014 PLD 79
• BAKHT JAMAL v. HAKEEM KHAN 2014 PLD 84
• RAZA KHAN v. M. ABID KHAN 2014 YLR 90
• Mst. PERVEEN v. CHIEF SECRETARY KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR 2014 PLD 92
• NAVEED ANJUM alias NAVEED HUSSAIN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 93

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

best law firm from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes