PRO. DR. M. ISLAM GOUHAR versus UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR
Arts 9, 25 and 199 Constitutional Submissions Civil Service Appointment Discrimination Employees were appointed to the position of Director and Chairman, respectively, with the scope scope Petitioner and his accompanying colleagues, in the Department of Pashto Affairs of the Pashto Academy and University To be taken care of. As a result, the University has appointed only such partner / private respondent as director on a regular basis and the applicant is ignored, for any reasonable reason, in violation of Article 25 of the Constitution. Can't be discriminated against and they are bound to happen. The rights of the applicant, as included in Article 9 of the Constitution where the aggrieved party alleged the discrimination, the court could not look at its implications. Restoration of justice If justice is not given even if administered, it can have many negative and negative effects on society, and dissatisfaction and frustration in the social system can be ruled out and social justice cannot be denied. Had a purpose and was incorporated in the constitution making it a suitable notification in relation to services. Was directed to research. The applicant, as was the case with his partner, was allowed constitutional application
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
