The su-suite suit for the possession of the property was filed by the Civil Court Scope Petitioners / Plaintiffs in possession of the property / house constructed before the Civil Court, which was decided in favor of the Plaintiffs, filed by the defendants. The appeal was accepted and the verdict and decision were upheld by the trial court. On the basis that the jurisdiction to exclude the tenant falls exclusively within the jurisdiction of the court and the civil court was barred from deciding the dispute on the matter, the plaintiffs / applicants' position The civil court had the exclusive jurisdiction to decide the case. The occupied house was occupied by transfer, so the appellate court erroneously set aside the trial decision and order. With regard to construction property, proceedings for eviction can only be filed in civil court, while the tenant can be evicted from agricultural property. Divided the Revenue Petitioners / Plaintiffs rightfully filed their case for possession by eviction of a tenant with no real property which had no connection to agricultural property in the form of property and jurisdiction in dispute. The construction was in nature and the decision, particularly with the civil court, was dismissed as irrelevant. An order passed by the appellate court was set aside, which approved the review request
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
