Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HAKAM ALI versus THE STATE


Almost fifteen years after the admission of its regular hearing after the Pakistan Penal Code Section 411 sentencing petition came up for hearing, not only was the sentence reduced but the accused not only sentenced to lengthy trials. Suffered from inconvenience but is also likely to drop a revision request for a period. Fifteen years, he was sentenced for not having enough punishment but six months' imprisonment / simple imprisonment which was already passing was reduced.

1985 P Cr. L J 2423

[Lahore]

Before Rustam S. Sidhwa, J

HAKAM ALI‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Revision No. 816 of 1969, heard on 6th April, 1985.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 411‑‑Sentence‑‑Revision petition coming up for hearing after almost fifteen years of its admission to regular hearing‑‑Conviction not challenged but only reduction of sentence sought‑‑Accused not only suffering agony of protracted trial but apprehension of dismissal of revision petition for a period of fifteen years, being itself a sufficient punishment‑‑Conviction maintained but sentence of six months' simple imprisonment reduced to one already undergone.

Muhammad Aslam Nagi for Petitioner.

Mushtaq Hussain for A.‑G. for the State.

Date of hearing: 6th April, 1985.

JUDGMENT

This is a revision petition filed by Hakam Ali, petitioner, against the judgment of a learned Additional District Magistrate of Lyallpur, dated 7‑6‑1969, dismissing his appeal. Earlier a Second Class Magistrate of Lyallpur, by his judgment, dated 15‑4‑1969, had convicted the petitioner under section 411, P.P.C. and sentenced him to six months' simple imprisonment.

2. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner only prays for the reduction of the sentence, on the ground that the present revision petition has come up for hearing after many years.

3. This petition, which was admitted in 1970, has come up for hearing' after almost fifteen years. The petitioner has not only suffered the agony of a protracted trial, but the apprehension of the dismissal of this petition for a period of fifteen years, has itself been a sufficient punishment. Taking all circumstances into consideration, I would reduce the sentence of the petitioner to that already undergone.

4. For the foregoing reasons, whilst maintaining the conviction of the petitioner under section 411, P.P.C. I reduce his sentence to that already undergone. The petitioner is on bail. His bail bond shall stand discharged. This petition stands partly accepted, in terms of reduction in sentence, as stated above.

H. A. K. Revision partly accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
inheritance advocates near Tando Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.