Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AKBAR KHAN versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497/498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 419/420/467/468/469/470 bail, obtained as a witness to the change in the grant of the accused Fake report found. Twenty months after the case was registered, the fingerprint expert did not file in court, to show that the impression of the accused's thumb varies, and all the other accomplices have been released on bail. Was entitled to be released

1985 P Cr. L J 2429

[Lahore]

Before Rustam S. Sidhwa, J

AKBAR KHAN‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1115‑B of 1985, decided on 1st June, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

---S. 497/498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 419/420/467/468/469/470‑ --Bail, grant of‑‑Accused subscribed as witness to a mutation, which was found to be forged‑‑Report of Finger Print Expert not filed in Court even after twenty months of registration of case to show that thumb‑impression of accused does appear on mutation‑‑All other co‑accused already released on bail‑‑Accused, held, was entitled to be released on bail in circumstances.

Naveed Shahryar for Petitioner.

Muhammad Rafi Siddiqui for the State.

ORDER

This is a petition under section 497/498, Cr. P. C. by Akbar Khan, petitioner for bail in respect of a case instituted against him and a number of others under section 420/4671468/419/469/470, P.P.C. at Police Station Bhagtanwala on 27‑9‑1983.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that Akbar Khan, petitioner, subscribed his signature as a witness to a mutation, by which the lands of one Mst. Mumtaz Begum were transferred in favour of Lal and Shashu, co‑accused. It is alleged that the said mutation was found to be forged and that Mst. Mumtaz Begum, the alleged owner, had not subscribed to the same.

3. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Akbar Khan, petitioner, who absconded in the case for quite some time, has now been arrested. Bail was refused to him on the ground that he had absconded. Strangely, even till now the report of the Finger Print Expert has not been filed in Court to show that the thumb‑impression of the petitioner does appear on the mutation. Be that as it may, all the other co‑accused have been released on bail. In these circumstances, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

4. For the foregoing reasons, this petition is accepted and Akbar Khan, petitioner, is released on bail, subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rupees thirty thousand (Rs.30,000) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

S.A. Petition accepted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Parachinar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.