Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IFTIKHAR versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 bail charged a sixth-grade student and a 14-year-old student according to the Medical Officer. In which several persons appeared before the investigating officer, the innocence of the accused was given to the accused in view of his tender age.

1985 P Cr. L J 2416

[Lahore]

Before Abdul Waheed, J

IFTIKHAR‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1113‑B of 1985, decided on 28th May1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 12‑‑Bail‑‑Accused a student of sixth class and 14 years of age according to Medical Officer‑‑Many persons appearing before Investigating Officer to vouchsafe innocence of accused‑‑Bail granted to accused in view of his tender age.

Ch. Muhammad Yamin for Petiti6ner.

Muhammad Shah Nawaz for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for post arrest bail of Iftikhar in a case registered against him and another at Police Station Saddar, Sialkot, on 20th of March, 1985, under section 12 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979.

2. The allegation is that on 17th of March, 1985, at about 4‑00 p.m. the petitioner and his co‑accused namely, Farooq Ahmad enticed away Rafaqat, aged about .8 years, to a wheat field and there the petitioner committed unnatural offence with him. The allegation against the co‑accused is that he was holding Rafaqat at the time of the alleged occurrence.

3. The co‑accused has been granted bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sialkot, vide his order, dated 9th of April, 1985 on the ground that he is only 10 years old and the only allegation against him is that he caught hold of the victim while the petitioner has been declined bail in view of the allegation that he committed the offence.

4. According to the Medical Officer, the petitioner is about 14 years of age. It is contented on his behalf by the learned counsel that in fact his age is only 12 years and he is a student of sixth class

5. His bail is sought on the ground of his tender age. It is asserted that the case against the petitioner is false and motivated. It is also stated that many persons have appeared before the Investigating Officer to vouchsafe the innocence of the petitioner. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel.

6. In view of the tender age of the petitioner, this application is accepted and the petitioner is admitted to bait' in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Sialkot.

H.A.K Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Washuk lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.