Attempts to compile Sections 561A, 190 (2), 265 D&CAP XXII (Sections 261 to 265), the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324 and 34, to abolish the Order of Common Pleas An application was made for the order of the session judge, under which the registration of the case under section 242424/34 34 was declared suspicious. And the record was returned to the applicant to apply the correct section of the law. After the Magistrate withheld the PRS police report pursuant to section 909090 (2) of the Sessions Court of Session under section one-fourteenth, CCPC, the complaint, and all other documents and prosecution, The statements filed by the Court of Session were of the view that there was no scope for proceedings for the trial of the accused. The court will make written charges against the accused. But in any case, the Court of Session has not been authorized to consider the FIR's registration dubious. The prosecutor was not authorized to return the record for the enforcement of the correct part of the law in a court session without the assistance of any evidence, or legal aid. And then sending it to the appropriate court for trial, the unclean order contradicts the procedure laid down under Chapter XII, CR PCC for trial under CRPC, to CRC for their Was responsible for accessing all reports, documents and statements. ; And then make an opinion at the time of the framing charge, which was lacking in the present case in which the procedure and the order passed in violation of the law were dismissed, according to the procedure given in Chap. XXII to the Sessions Judge. With instructions to advance the case. , CR PC
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
