Article 42 of the Qanun Shahadat (10 (of the)), Article Su 79 suit which was declared by the power of attorney, Burden of the prosecution partner, the defendant's dispute rights that the suit property was sold to them by the defendants. The suit was simultaneously justified. The burden of proof should be on the person who took advantage of the transaction or took advantage of it, the power of attorney was confirmed by two witnesses but none of them No one appeared in the witness box to confirm his signature. The person who alleged that the witness was not alive to present another document that I had The bald statement about the victim's relative or friend for comparison to the case would not be sufficient evidence that the victim had signed the document should be confirmed by the execution of the document. The witness was not required by law No witness deposed that in his presence the power of attorney was signed or thumbed by the defendants D Sellers failed to prove the facts of the sale payment, defense Witness's original script of Power of Attorney was not contested for the purpose of admitting his father's signature Yes, in the absence of the original, the reference to the copy should not be considered admissible proof. No one was allowed to face a copy of the document without prior authorization to prove such a lost document through secondary evidence; the evidence that the said witness was inadmissible should not be considered. The executors denied implementation of the registered document then said the document
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
