Section 497 (2) Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (ii) Shijaja and Modya bail, approval of further investigation case firearm, non-recurrence of the incident was present at midnight and no one was on record. An independent witness was not available. Except that no weapon of justification for the complainant's statement was recovered from the spot and the investigation was almost complete in this case, therefore, the accused's case was involved in further investigation, the co-accused had already been released on bail. The incident was initially described, so the principle should be consistent in that the acute acute and medical evidence was present on the record, there was no recurrence of the act / fire nor any fracture. Apart from not mentioning the motive in the FIR, nothing in the record suggested that the accused was a former offender. Was. Habitual or severe or dangerous offender, therefore, the accused was entitled to bail privilege. In the circumstances it was allowed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
