Section 497 (1) (2) (5) to consider the issue of cancellation of bail grants and guaranteed grounds, approval of bail and cancellation of bail were quite different once an accused was released on bail. If so, it cannot be freedom. Interference with lightly recognized grounds for cancellation of bail. (i) If the order to grant bail was clearly illegal, false, in fact wrong, and has resulted in a misunderstanding of justice. (ii) During the investigation some fresh facts, or material, were collected by the police, which may have tended to establish or identify the accused's guilt. (iii) the accused who misappropriated his freedom by engaging in similar criminal activity. (iv) that the accused intervened during the investigation. (v) that the accused attempted to tamper with the evidence of the prosecution. (vi) The accused threatened witnesses or engaged in a similar activity that would facilitate the investigation, and there is a possibility that he may have fled to another country. And (vii) who alleged that he could not be made available to the underground or the investigating agency, stated that this was an example and that the cancellation of his bail was not a strict order, as he did not allow any person to be freed. Intervened. Such an order should not be lightly resolved when a request for bail was made, and the cancellation of the bail (approved) was another matter, as the cancellation of the bail was already received by the accused. Freedom interferes, either at arbitrary exercise. The power of the court, or the law, to arrest the accused, which was extended on bail,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
