Sections 302 (b) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 2 (b) and 7 Qatl e amd convictions of the accused were under the age of 18 at the time of the incident and they were minor. The case was due to the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 school leaving certificate and the national identity card of the accused presented in court, showing that the accused was under the age of 18 at the time of the incident. Was under the age of eighteen, the trial was to be conducted under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, and the trial and sentencing of the accused by the trial court were set aside. A. And after dealing with a prisoner under trial, his case was sent to the trial court for a de novo trial after witnessing / completing all required formal procedures under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
