MANDI HASSAN ALIAS MEHDI HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD ARIF
Section 115 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 5 and the first Schedule to Article 181 civil review application (not entered for regular hearing) are dismissed for illegal proceedings, to restore such a revocation request The fixed-term maintenance scope was not included in the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Provisions for the completion of a situation where a revision applicant failed to appear and failed to file his case where a revision request for a regular hearing was not filed when the court reached its final jurisdiction to conclude Should be excluded by the court for illegal proceedings. In order to prevent justice and court proceedings from being misused, which was recognized by the court as the hereditary power of the court, the CPC has similarly resumed its dismissal and restitution. Can do. Since the issue of rehabilitation has taken place, however, it should be done only if the court's inherent jurisdiction to restore the revised revocation petition for illegal proceedings requested by the Applicable Limitation Act, 1908 There was no specific period of limitation, so the residence of Article 181, Limitation Act, 1908 will be drawn in which a period of three years will be provided. For this purpose, such revision will be the starting point for the restoration of the application when the amendment was rejected for illegal proceedings (subject to certain exceptions available under the Limitation Act, 1908). A copy of the present decision should be sent to the Secretary concerned requesting a limited review
