Sections 302, 148 and 149 of Katil Amad, riot with deadly weapons, evidence of illegal assembly were present and residents of the area where the incident occurred. Eyewitnesses on the scene suspected the presence of eyewitnesses on the scene suspected that they were traveling in a vehicle with the deceased before any connecting material was assisted before being stopped by the accused party. The role of one of the co-accused was contradicted by medical evidence Medical evidence also did not support a large number of wounds on the body of the deceased. Both witnesses have admitted that the accused was not direct, enmity was also committed in committing the crime, which denied involvement of the accused persons but could not be trusted that the accused was taken to the capital. Failed to prove his case against the accused beyond the shadow of a doubt as prosecutor for sentencing I was He was acquitted on the charge that he was sentenced to death
