Section 4 and 5 Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Explosion Attempt to contain explosives in suspicious circumstances, testimony of terror action evidence No eyewitness was available and legal proceedings were completed. The confessional statement was an excuse in nature by the accused, as it contained neither admission nor confession. And the trial was unfounded, the evidence of the CCTV recording should not be accepted as a weak kind of evidence, neither clear nor compelling, but immersed in the mystery that the law enforcement How have the bodies reached the accused? The only case was proved by the prosecution where the indictment of the accused's guilt could be drawn, because the evidence falls far short of the prosecution's prescription, not according to the statements of the prosecution witnesses, Neglect was not justified In the evidence of litigation, the material contradictions and weaknesses were set aside by the accused, and they were acquitted of the charges they were accused of and were set under liberty. ?
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
