Section 2? (b) Conan testimony (10 of 1984 1984), Article Q 46 Qatil-e-Amad appreciated the evidence because according to the said certificate, the doctor examined the injured complainant for 30 hours while, according to the prosecution witness, The person who filed the complainant's report stated that he had arrived at the hospital at 13 hours, the prosecutor's witness said, although he recorded the report of the injured complainant, but did not prepare his injury sheet. , Or referring him to a medical officer, or obtaining a fitness certificate from a doctor at the relevant time, and appearing as a prosecution witness. There was nothing in his statement. Neither did she testify nor did her statement indicate that there was a contradiction about the time of the deceased's arrival, but the doctor at the hospital reported something about her presence with the police at the time of the report. Was not disclosed, which made the prosecution the suspected witnesses by the prosecution, neither were the witnesses to the incident nor in their presence, the victim, the injured had made the statement to the victim's police or doctor husband, The alleged eyewitness to the incident, being a key witness to the prosecution, was left without investigation for any reason, extremely natural and The Prevention Act will give a material witness to the incident, giving the impression that the witness, if presented, probably would not have supported the prosecution, said the witness was prevented from saying that the witness recorded further evidence of the prosecution's case. Made available on, was not the kind of role that could be trusted. Capital punishment for the accused because the prosecution
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
