STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR versus FAROOQ
Contrary to the evidence of section 9 criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), section 417 (2A), the appeal of a narcotic drug against rapherasyllable has no comprehensible justification for prohibiting the forensic science laboratory after a delay of twelve days. The accused was not a history sheeter and had not been convicted in the same case. In similar cases, the prosecution failed to bring charges against the accused from home. With the commission, it came to the conclusion that the prosecution established its case against the suspects beyond any reasonable shadow of suspicion. Rennes has not been successful, the court can not refuse to evil. Or no cynical motive could be achieved, if the undesirable decision of the court below was decided precisely, a remand for an ND case trial was obtained, as the possibility of the defendant's conviction was remote. And the re-trial will result in useless practice
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
