Find a Lawyer

NOORMAR JAN versus ABDUL DEYAN

Section 13 Affidavit, Incomplete Impact of Requirements Rival Pressure Performance The plaintiff's inadequacy did not inspect the informant and it could be pointed out that if he was presented as a witness, he must be compliant. Was unsuccessful. Section 13 of the Pre-emptive Act 1987 dismissed in circumstances

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• Mst. SAMINA YASMIN v. AMAN ULLAH 2014 CLC 871
• The STATE through Regional Director ANF v. AZIZ-UR-REHMAN 2014 YLR 879
• Dr. Syed ANSAR HUSSAIN SHAH NAQVI v. KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 2014 PLC(CS) 879
• STATE through Advocate-General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar v. FAROOQ 2014 PCrLJ 882
• IMTIAZ v. State 2014 YLR 892
• TIPU M. SULTAN v. REGISTRAR 2014 PLC(CS) 893
• AMIR alias AMIR SULTAN v. State 2014 YLR 896
• CHIEF ENGINEER CRBC, DISTRICT DERA ISMAIL KHAN v. BHAWAL DIN 2014 CLC 900

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

us immigration advocates from Chiniot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes