Section 6A6A Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Application for Sections 9 (c), 32 and 33 of the Superdry, the grant of drug transport was to the applicant that the accused was his driver and he Didn't know he had a car. The trial court rejected the request for superdee and the accused was convicted and the vehicle was confiscated, the trial court was bound by the applicant's search for Mains Re or any contribution record made by him was silent. Whether or not any question or inquiry was disclosed by the raiding party or the Investigation Officer that the applicant was aware of the illegal transport of the Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 under Articles 32 and 33 of the intoxicating substance In order to protect the rights of the innocent owner, it would be unjust to punish a person in the absence of a male and seize the vehicle. Services to car confiscation (only) as determined in terms of W. Decision was set aside and the trial was the trial court on remand request that evidence be removed after proper definition.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
