Section 6565A Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (e) Kevin E. Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 129 (g) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 164 Kid Abduction or Abduction for Property, Valuable security, etc. Defining the evidence of the terror act, the suspect has not been recovered from the custody of the accused, nor has there been any evidence of payment of the ransom by the complainant, taking advantage of the doubt. Another person complained of prosecution to the accused and was not presented to the complainant, nor did the accused kidnapping the complainant before the trial court for recording their statements. , Which made the prosecution's story doubtful if any of the parties had the best evidence and If you are prevented, then, it will be understood that the party has not presented evidence of harm to the fermentation of honey under Article 129 for example (g) Example. 984, can be fairly drawn in this case, there was only serious evidence against the accused, the retaliatory court had confessed, the two accused remained in police custody for about eight to eight days before recording their confessional statements, And there was no explanation of the delay that the court had to examine. Whether the confessional statement was made voluntary, repressive and torture-free, as well as the circumstances under which it was made, and the accused retreated, remained in police custody for eight days. There is every possibility that they will be persuaded by the police. Great for making a confessional statement
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
