MUHAMMAD HANIF KHAN versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PAKISTAN
Issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with respect to Section 18, 4 and 17 Compensation Compensation Court. Such compensation cannot be declared as the true and original value of the acquired land, nor of the acquired land. The location could not be traced, nor was a local commission set up by a trial to determine the potential for such land. The court considered the increase in the value of the real estate as the potential value of a land that should be considered, while determining the appropriate compensation for the acquired land was located on the extreme edge of the Acquired Land Highway and the land of the University. Will speak for the potential of this place. The same, which should be kept in mind when determining the correct market value, cannot be accepted either by the Collector nor the Bald statement of the testimony raised by the Referee Court. The High Court has made 15000 compulsory charges in the amount of compensation. And has expanded to Rs 75,000 per kanal with a simple interest of 6%. The landlord's appeal was cleared from the date of payment of such sums, the tendency to increase real estate prices, the depreciation of the national currency and the acquisition of the land acquired till the award issuance, depending on the potential value. However, the relevant department's request was dismissed. Conditions
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
