Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PEERAN DITTA versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 426 (IA), suspension of applicants resulting in minor injury to a sharp weapon resulting in execution, suspension

1983 P Cr. L J 1951

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MIRAJ DIN AND OTHERS-Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1936-B of 1982, decided on 4th August. 1982.

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-----

-----S. 426 (I-A)-Sentence, suspension of--Petitioner causing a simple injury with a sharp-edged weapon-Execution of sentence suspended, in circumstances.

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

----S. 426(1-A)-Sentence, suspension of-Petitioner armed with a pistol and causing a simple injury on leg of victim-Suspension of sentence declined, in circumstance.

Kh. Muhammad Sharif for Petitioners.

Muhammad Khan for the State.

ORDER

This is an application on behalf of Miraj Din and Muhammad Tufail for suspension of execution of sentence in an appeal pending adjudication before the Additional Sessions Judge. Lahore. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Miraj Din was allegedly armed with pistol and he caused simple injury on the right leg of the victim, whereas Muhammad Tufail who was allegedly armed with a sword, caused simple injury on the thumb of Mst. Siddiqan P. W. The learned counsel for the State has opposed this application.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties I find that the appeal was filed by the petitioners on 7th July, 1982 and the learned Additional Sessions Judge gave a long date, i. e. 21st September, 1982 Since Muhammad Tufail petitioner has caused simple injury with a sharp-edged weapon, the execution of his sentence is hereby suspended and he is allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 5.000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C. Sadar, Lahore.

3. So far as bail application of Miraj Din is concerned, no case for suspension of his sentence is made out, as he was armed with a pistol and fired at the victim. His application is dismissed.

4. The learned Additional Sessions Judge is directed to dispose of the appeal on 21st September, 1982 or immediately thereafter.

Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Liaquat Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.