Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ALI versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Bail, Grants of murder case were shot at night, they were kept on the spot, bail was allowed in case of further inquiry,

1983 P Cr. L J 1953

[Lahore]

Before Gul Muhammad Khan, J

MUHAMMAD ALI AND ANOTHER-Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 697-B of 1981, decided on 19th August, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code- (V of 1898)-

--------S. 497-Bail, grant of----Murder-case-Deceased shot dead at night time but no identification parade held although complainant claming to identify culprits if brought before him-Petitioners only identified by two prosecution witnesses on basis of cloth left behind by them at spot-Held, A case of further enquiry-Bail allowed, in circumstances.

Ch. Muhammad Hussain for Petitioners.

M. Sultan Alam for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail with regard to offences under section 302(34, P. P. C. According to the contents of the F. I. R. some persons had reached near the Rest House, Khanewal. There the complainant Abdul Hamid and another were on watch duty. They questioned the identity of these two approaching persons whereafter one of them fired at Noor Din on account of which he died. The two accused then ran away.

It was stated by the complainant in the F. I. R., that he would identify the two persons if they are brought before him. According to the learned counsel for the State, who is assisted by the Investigating Officer, no identification parade took place. He however, relies on the statement of Sultan Ahmad whose cycle was allegedly stolen by the two accused petitioners. There are two other witnesses also who have identified the cloth left behind by the petitioners at the scene of the occurrence. As admittedly no identification parade was conducted particularly when the complainant specifically stated that he could recognise the persons, I think it is a case for further inquiry. The petitioners are, therefore, directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 20,000 (twenty thousand) each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Khanewal.

2. The trial Court, however, shall be at liberty to consider the question of cancellation of bail in case any evidence is brought before it justifying the identity.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Kala Bagh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.