Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL HAMEED versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 bail, the absence of the applicant in the murder case and the inciting of a co-accused is presented a day before the murder, which further investigated. In need, in situations

1983 P Cr. L J 1950

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan; J

ABDUL HAM EED-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. I90g.g of 1982, decided on 2nd August; 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

-----S. 497-Bail, grant of--Murder-case-Petitioner not present at spot at time of occurrence and allegation of instigating co-accused one day before occurrence to kill deceased requiring further enquiry-Bail allowed, in circumstances.

Raja Muhammad Yaqub Khan for Petitioner.

Iqbal Ahmad Cheema for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Abdul Hameed under section 302/148/149, P. P. C. registered at P. S. Dijkot, vide F. I. R. No. 114, dated 14th June, 1982.

2 The prosecution case is that Hassan and 9 others in furtherance of their common object caused the death of Zahoor Hussain on 14th June, 1992 at 5-30 a.m. in the area of Chak No. 252/9. B. As for the petitioner it has been alleged that one day before the occurrence he had instigated the co-accused to do away with the deceased.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not present at the spot and the only allegation against him is that one day before the occurrence be had instigated the co-accused to kill the deceased. The learned counsel for the State has opposed this application and has stated that the police has recorded the statement of Abdul Hameed and Rustam to the effect that the petitioner had instigated the co-accused to kill the deceased.

4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I find that the petitioner was not present at the spot at the time of occurrence and the allegation of instigation in the circumstances of the case needs further enquiry. He is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C., Faisalabad.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.