MERCK (PRIVATE) LIMITED versus MEMBER LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA
Article 41 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application unfair labor practice workman, proof of back benefits Apply salary without any work The court allowed the notice of complaint and restored the employees with back benefits was approved by the Labor Court The decision was taken by the Labor Appellate Tribunal. The employer was that the employees were officers and not laborers. The nature of the justification / employment could determine the status of the worker / worker and the position did not determine whether the employees claimed to perform their duties as employees. Therefore, it was imperative to disclose the nature of his employment in the notice of complaint as well as the application under section 41 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2008, but this was not done and both the courts were able to Failed to take feature notes. Labor laws, as a court NT worker to maintain the process within the scope of application status and its removal should result in an industrial dispute unless the reinstatement of back-paid employees was against the principle that no Not paid salaried employees were not allowed to be punished or considered exemplary in favor of the employees, but were only for the residence of an employee who suffered due to losing his job and in the meantime the Labor Court As well as the High Court's decisions available on the Labor Appellate Tribunal's misrepresentations and false documents / records They had to take advantage of a job by putting them aside. The following were approved by the two courts and the trial court applied the same to the remand decision on remand.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
