Sections 337A, 337E, 337F (V), 337N (2) and 149 due to confidentiality, confusion, award to the trader, the prosecution to exploit the evidence of common object evidence. The allegation was made not only by the defense, but also by the testimony of the witnesses. And the suggestions given by the defense stimulus were not deduced from the norm. While the complainant reaffirmed the facts as listed in the FIR, the witnesses of the injured prosecution assigned specific roles to the accused, the injuries on the person of the prosecutor's witnesses were further substantiated by medical evidence. Can be brought by any of the accused, because no one entered his defense, nor any defense witness was presented. And in this case, the number of people belonging to one family was designated, the nomination of the maximum number of persons belonging to the opposing family was affected by the insulting objection. Except for the accused, the rest were given no overt action. Injured witnesses do not always speak the whole truth. Of the 14 accused, the case of eight accused was not free in any way. The benefit to which their favor would be extended, not as a grace, but as a right to only five people, was assigned a specific role, as the evidence of the injured prosecutor was not sufficient to prove the evidence. Was acknowledged by the source. In the circumstances, the five accused have successfully proven their case, they were rightly liable for the commission of the crime, while none of them can be held guilty of any criminal wrongdoing. Their crime
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
