Sections 302 (b), 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) define the evidence of the convicted, common-purpose, terrorist act. Some cases, even in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, were noted. Went, but his evidence could not be excluded on the eyewitness testimony, indicating that the accused, after taking refuge near the mosque, shot and killed the dead person. Medical reports say that the deceased person was injured with heavy weapons, as well as firearms. People in their statements acknowledged the incident, their presence on the site and the motive on which witnesses testified. The allegations were made by the accused, the statements of the witnesses fully confirming the evidence of the witnesses that the accused was present with the statements of the accused. Among the suspects, it was shown that they were not hiding the facts by telling the truth, eyewitness testimony could not be denied completely, but they could be safely relied upon, which led to the Investigation Officer and the recovery. In the testimony of the witnesses, those involved in the crime had confirmed the facts, the statements of the witnesses were not subject to any major contradiction, but each of them was confirmed. The second Syed credible evidence has established that the prosecution of the accused has committed a crime under section 149, after making illegal assembly, PPC suspects accused of making illegal assembly, killing four persons. And one was seriously injured in the light of day. The matter was brought under section 6 (a) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, which can be punished under section 7 (a) of the Act.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
