MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN versus SECRETARY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS HASHIM KHAN TRUST, QUETTA
Section 52 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 120 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Declaration of inheritance scope suit with respect to the inheritance limit Defendants' dispute was that it created trust and deprived them of their inheritance. The suit was dismissed by the trial court. The suit property was exchanged in the name of three sons and two daughters were mentioned by the Revenue Officer only three sons but did not mention the deceased's daughters in the change of inheritance. The right of successor to the successor will arise from the history of The automatic vesting of new heirs will not affect any right of inheritance in favor of the legal heir at the time of the legal heirs except the deceased shall be co-owners and co-owners of the property. The fact that the one who had a common partner was considered to be the possession of all the partners will not deprive the legal heirs of their rights, nor will any individual be the exclusive owner of such ownership mutation. I was not an interior designation document, but that speculation was the dominant piece of evidence to establish the truth. Be attached to the entries in the revenue records but such an assumption was rejected that the entries in the revenue records can be challenged if they have such knowledge or if a person does not consider himself a victim of such entry If I'm interested they can refer. When the court is upset with such an entry or someone has denied it properly, file a time to file a declaration
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
