Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus JUNAN

Article Spec 797 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the implication of the plaintiff's failure to certify the two certified witnesses of a contract for sale of the 42 suit was that the defendant had a contract to sell with her but Transferred one part of the suit area to another. The sale contract was simultaneously rejected Waldetti the plaintiff was bound to prove his case and could not take advantage of the weakness of the other side was presented with a copy of the sale agreement which could not help the plaintiff. As it had not. According to the law, the document was deemed unacceptable for not displaying the document because only one minor witness of the contract to sell it was presented in court while the other marginal witness was not produced by the plaintiff. And the other witnesses did not sign the document. Used as evidence when two witnesses proved it, the copy of the document could not be recognized as secondary evidence in connection with the evidence of the alleged agreement to sell the documents produced by the plaintiff. It was not sufficient to exclude the circumstance which was not proved unless the evidence was waived unless the evidence presented by the plaintiff recorded the documents relating to the contradictory results. ? The courts below were well established that the plaintiff failed to identify any illegal, irregularities, and neither the evidence was misrepresented by the courts under which the revision was excluded in the circumstances. Was.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014

• MRDUMAN-E-MALLE ZAI NIDA KAHOL through Haji Saleh Muhammad v. MARDUMAN-E-KILLI KHUDAI-E-RAHIM SADEZAI (SHAI) 2014 CLC 426
• The STATE through Prosecutor-General Balochistan, Quetta v. ABDUL ALEEM 2014 PCrLJ 432
• KHAN MUHAMMAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 449
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Water and Power, Islamabad 2014 PLC(CS) 467
• MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN v. SECRETARY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS HASHIM KHAN TRUST, QUETTA 2014 YLR 553
• Haji MUHAMMAD JAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 571
• MITHA KHAN UMRANI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary National Assembly, Islamabad 2014 PLC(CS) 571
• SAIMA v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Education Department, Quetta 2014 PLC(CS) 579

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2014 →

best advocate from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes