DOSSANI TRAVELS PVT. LTD versus TRAVELS SHOP (PVT) LTD.
Supreme Court's Constitutional Jurisdiction over Arts 199, 185, and 18 High Court Judicial Review on Hajj Policy, Allocation of Hajj Quota to Hajj Group Operators, Supreme Court's Interim Order Approved in the Constitution Appeal to appeal to the court The High Court has, under the interim order, directed the Ministry of Religious Affairs to bid for the Hajj quota to 60 high-ranking HGOs and 4 others quoted in previous years. Invite them to participate in the process, and those candidates who offer the lowest bid and satisfy other requirements also 50 Hajj licenses will be issued, each appellant believed that he was HGO, and because of his performance in the previous year, the quota was already allocated under the Ministry of Hajj Policy 2013, and non Due to the disagreeable order bit and the law being disagreeable, put aside. Especially when the appellant had already made arrangements and had booked the pilgrims. And they were given the "Hajj Approval Letter, 2013" under Article 18 of the Constitution which gave the government the power to formulate a policy and the Hajj policy was formulated in terms of the governing powers that were exempted under Article 18. Was. The Hajj policy was developed by the Ministry of Religious Affairs (\ MORA by) and was approved by the Cabinet. And the appellants were legally registered HGOs who were also given the quota of the previous year (2012) and did the work without complaint, the appellants also started booking the pilgrims who are going forward for the Hajj in the current year. And made arrangements. At the same time
